If you could go back to Casablanca, there’s an interesting scene to think about. The character called Louis who was the police chief closed his cafe. He claimed that the reason was the fact that the gambling took place in the cafe and he got very much money from the cashier. Equally bizarre logic is at the root of the Unauthorized Internet Gambling Enforcement Act that was brought to life in 2006.
This hypothetical bill was created by the Post Security Act and handled by Republican Bill Frist. The bill was wisely passed at an unnatural hour of the night and thus did not catch much attention for discussion and debate about it. The interesting Congress remains clueless about the amendments being made. The bill has the pretext of providing an effective service by ensuring and porting safety. Daftar Asia855
The reasons why Senator Frist brought this change were financial law violations and the involvement of minors in online gambling. Of these, one point can make several reasons from the first but then the last part of the reasons are somewhat irrelevant and pointless. There’s also a lot of negative information available on various sites which can include bomb-making procedures, hate groups, and so on.
One of the most surprising arguments ever made in this connection is the possible support of online gambling against terrorism. Surely terrorism is going to be a rather serious business and none of the updates so far suggest any kind of connection. It’s just an excuse for the government to justify its agenda.
It’s unfair of Mr Frist to interfere with people’s private lives with this kind of law. His assertion that mortar and brick casinos do not do much harm, but online bingo does make it very paradoxical to understand. The online gaming software that blocks kids from playing bingo seems to steal all the explanations.
The basic psychology of American society is to hate government interference in everyday life. Yet somehow it was not understood by government officials. People here want to have absolute control over their decisions regarding their own money. For a long time now, charitable organizations and churches have used bingo to raise funds. But then back in those days not everyone could play the game because of the geographical location and the distance they had to travel to and from. In this respect online bingo has been very beneficial as they have helped to cross boundaries and engage everyone.
Interestingly, there are also legislators who understand and empathize with public life. Barney Frank (D-Mass) put forward a new bill that would remove the negative aspects of the Uniform Internet Gambling Enforcement Act. He suggested that one could actually consider taxing the income earned from online gaming rather than forcing people to stop spending it.
